32Design a doc-QA system for a healthcare customer that reliably says 'I don't know' instead of guessing.▼hardAnthropicOpenAIGoogle2 replies◆ premiumIn high-stakes domains a wrong answer is worse than no answer, but a system that always abstains is useless. The selective-prediction design, the layered abstention triggers, and the two metrics that govern the tradeoff.Open full answer →
43Defend a high-stakes generation pipeline against jailbreaks and hallucination at the same time.▼hardAnthropicOpenAIScale1 replies◆ premiumTwo failure modes, one architecture. Why no single guardrail holds, the defense-in-depth layers that assume the model will be broken, and the design rule that limits the blast radius when prompt filters inevitably fail.Open full answer →
13Build doc-QA for healthcare where a wrong answer is worse than no answer. How do you make it reliably say 'I don't know'?▼mediumAnthropicHarveyOpenAI1 replies○ sign inCalibrated abstention is a system property, not a prompt line. Learn the four abstention signals, the precision-at-coverage framing, and why 'just tell it to say I don't know' fails the interview.Open full answer →
34A customer wants to auto-decide on a high-stakes classifier. How do you make the probabilities safe to act on?▼hardGoogleScaleDatabricks2 replies◆ premiumWhen a model auto-approves loans or routes patients, the probability is the product, not a dashboard number. The calibration-plus-abstention design that lets a customer trust an automated decision, and the subgroup trap that gets it pulled in audit.Open full answer →