FDEInterviews logoFDE/Interviews
Machine Learning & Data Science / 61
mediumOpenAIAnthropicScale AI

How do you evaluate an LLM's output quality?

There's no single number. The trap is reaching for perplexity or BLEU because they're easy to compute, then optimizing a score that has nothing to do with whether the output is good. The move is to match the metric to the task and name where each one lies to you.

Updated Aug 2026 · Grounded in real Forward Deployed Engineer interview loops and written to a senior-engineer editorial bar.

There's no single number. The trap is reaching for perplexity or BLEU because they're easy to compute, then optimizing a score that has nothing to do with whether the output is good. The move is to match the metric to the task and name where each one lies to you.

Unlock the other 466 answers · ₹2,000 / $25Your progress and mastery stay saved · 6 months · one payment · no auto-renew
UP NEXT ON YOUR JOURNEY
FEDITOR'S NOTE

The discriminating follow-up is 'your BLEU went up but users complain the answers got worse, what happened?' The strong answer names n-gram metrics as surface-overlap proxies that reward copying reference phrasing and punish a correct paraphrase, so they decouple from quality on open-ended generation. Candidates who treat 'higher BLEU = better' as a law fail here.

DISCUSSION · 0

No comments yet — be the first to share your approach.